Title

Responsibility and the Aims of Theory: Strawson and Revisionism

Authors

Manuel R. Vargas, University of San FranciscoFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-2004

Abstract

Strawsonian approaches to responsibility, including more recent accounts such as Dennett’s and Wallace’s, face a number of important objections. However, Strawsonian theories can be recast along revisionist lines so as to avoid many of these problems. In this paper, I explain the revisionist approach to moral responsibility, discuss the concessions it makes to incompatibilism (including the point that compatibilists may not fully capture what our commonsense understanding of responsibility), why it provides a fruitful recasting of Strawsonian approaches, and how it offers an alternative to the pattern of dialectical stalemates exhibited by standard approaches to free will and determinism.

Comments

Article published in Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, June 2004, Vol. 85 Issue 2, p218-241, 24p.

DOI:10.1111/j.0279-0750.2004.00195.x.

The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com

Recommended Citation

Vargas, Manuel R., "Responsibility and the Aims of Theory: Strawson and Revisionism" (2004). Philosophy. 2.
https://repository.usfca.edu/phil/2