Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1997
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in BMW v. Gore (1996) in May. This decision triggered another round of discussions regarding restraints on punitive damages as a part of the overall reform of the U.S. tort system. Here, the authors review the BMW decision and its immediate predecessors to illustrate the essential public policy issues that are associated with proposed limits on punitive damages.
Recommended Citation
Fred Morgan and Karl Boedecker, “Punitive Damages after BMW v. Gore (1996),” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16 (Spring), 163-172. 1997
Comments
This article was published by the American Marketing Association, and is available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30000434