Entering onto the Path of Inference: Textualism and Contextualism in the Bruton Trilogy

Authors

DAVID ARAM KAISER

Publication Year

2009

Abstract

This Article draws on the Scalian textualist debate in legal theory and the analogous debate in literary theory to argue that a complete rejection of Richardson’s facial incrimination standard is necessary to restore any sort of coherence to Bruton doctrine.

Recommended Citation

KAISER, DAVID ARAM (2009) "Entering onto the Path of Inference: Textualism and Contextualism in the Bruton Trilogy," University of San Francisco Law Review: Vol. 44: Iss. 1, Article 4.
Available at: https://repository.usfca.edu/usflawreview/vol44/iss1/4