Publication Year
2008
Abstract
This Comment argues that the Ninth Circuit was mistaken in concluding that Jespersen fell outside of the Supreme Court's rule on sex-stereotyping discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Recommended Citation
Lifson-Leu, Amy
(2008)
"Enforcing Femininity: How Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co. Leaves Women in Typically Female Jobs Vulnerable to Workplace Sex Discrimination,"
University of San Francisco Law Review: Vol. 42:
Iss.
3, Article 7.
Available at:
https://repository.usfca.edu/usflawreview/vol42/iss3/7
