Date of Graduation
Fall 12-12-2025
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)
College/School
School of Education
Department
Learning and Instruction
Program
Learning & Instruction EdD
First Advisor
Dr. Patricia L. Busk
Second Advisor
Dr. Xornam Apedoe
Third Advisor
Dr. Sedique Popal
Abstract
Although working memory (WM) capacity has been highlighted in many theories of first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) reading comprehension, some scholars argue that its importance may be overstated and that existing findings are still inconclusive. Even with extensive research since 1995, the literature has lacked a thorough quantitative review of these results. This study shows that WM capacity is positively related to reading comprehension. The current secondary meta-analysis examined the relationship between WM capacity and reading comprehension in both L1 and L2, using two authoritative meta-analytic datasets: Daneman and Merikle’s (1996) for L1 and Jeon and Yamashita’s (2022) for L2. To conduct a comprehensive assessment of heterogeneity, this study recommends considering two types: absolute heterogeneity (measured by Cohen’s q) and relative heterogeneity (measured by Higgins’ I2). The width of the prediction intervals, as an indicator of absolute heterogeneity, is evaluated using Cohen’s q, with operational definitions similar to those provided by Cohen (1988). Additionally, the width of the confidence intervals, as a measure of the precision of the pooled mean, is assessed using Cohen’s q, and similar operational definitions are included. To conduct a comprehensive assessment of heterogeneity, this study recommends considering two types: absolute heterogeneity (measured by Cohen’s q that quantifies the width of the prediction interval) and relative heterogeneity. The width of the prediction intervals, as an indicator of absolute heterogeneity, is evaluated using Cohen’s q. Additionally, the width of the confidence intervals, as a measure of the precision of the pooled mean, is assessed using Cohen’s q.
Recommended Citation
MIKHAILIK, G. (2025). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORKING MEMORY AND READING COMPREHENSION: A SECONDARY META-ANALYSIS. Retrieved from https://repository.usfca.edu/diss/768
