This Article examines from a comparative perspective the rules of evidence relating to relevance and its limits. The Article compares the approaches of the California Evidence Code ("Code") and the Federal Rules of Evidence ("Rules") to challenges to the introduction of evidence on the grounds of irrelevance or on the basis of limits placed on the introduction of relevant evidence.
Méndez, Miguel A.
"Relevance: Definition and Limitations-Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence,"
University of San Francisco Law Review: Vol. 42
, Article 4.
Available at: http://repository.usfca.edu/usflawreview/vol42/iss2/4