Article Title
Publication Year
2003
Abstract
IN STIRLEN V SUPERCUTS,1 defendant Supercuts moved to compel arbitration of plaintiff Stirlen's state statutory and common law claims pursuant to an arbitration clause that made very clear its intent to deprive Stirlen of most of his remedies.
Recommended Citation
Schwartz, David S.
(2003)
"Understanding Remedy-Stripping Arbitration Clauses: Validity, Arbitrability, and Preclusion Principles,"
University of San Francisco Law Review: Vol. 38:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
Available at:
https://repository.usfca.edu/usflawreview/vol38/iss1/5
COinS
